The Orion Nebula (NASA) |
How did God create the universe? You might be surprised to find out. The description in Genesis 1 could not use the
specialized vocabulary we have today to talk about physics and astronomy. So it used the closest available equivalents to
bring its point across.
An example is the word “waters”
in Gen. 1:2. What do you think when you
read “the Spirit of God was hovering*
over the surface of the waters” (Gen. 1:2)?
Do you get a picture of a sea or ocean that looks
pretty much like the earth looks today?
But the Bible says the seas were not made until the third day of
Creation (Gen. 1:10). If these waters
were not seas, what were they?
To answer that question, we have to go back to the first
part of the verse, which says: “And the earth was formless and empty” (tohu va’vohu in Hebrew; Gen. 1:2a). In
modern Hebrew, the expression tohu
va’vohu means ‘all mixed up’ or confused.
That the earth was formless means exactly what it says: the earth hadn’t yet been given any form,
which means, of course, that the earth didn’t exist yet. And it was empty (or void) because, you
guessed it, what we call the earth wasn’t there yet.*
* The phrase “tohu
va’vohu” does not imply that an already existing earth was destroyed, as
the Gap Theory teaches. This was a 19th
century attempt to harmonize the Bible with Evolution. It claimed that there was a gap between Gen.
1:1 and Gen. 1:2. But Genesis 1:1 is not
describing a prior creation. It’s simply
a section heading, describing the topic of the following section. Other similar section headings appear in Gen.
3:1, 5:1, etc.
Instead there was just this dark, confused mass of “waters.” By comparing this description to other
Ancient Near Eastern writings, it’s clear that what the writer is talking about
is what’s often called the ‘primeval chaos’: a time when everything
was a confused mess, before the Creator sorted it out in the Creation.*
* In other Near Eastern cultures, this chaos was personified
as a god or goddess. But in the Hebrew
Bible, it is presented in a purely materialistic manner, in opposition to
polytheism.
What this means is that this is not just a description of an
unformed earth. It’s the description of
a chaotic universe. The “waters”
that appear here are not ordinary waters:
they’re more like flood waters that carry along huge amounts of dirt and
rocks and other materials mixed into them.
But these primeval waters held all the elements of the entire universe all
mixed up together in a dark watery stew.
In fact, all there was in the entire universe at that moment in time was
this dark watery soup. As Peter put it, “the heavens and the earth were formed long
ago out of water and by water by the Word of God” (2 Pet. 3:5).*
* The beginning of the universe in a dark primeval soup is not
entirely unlike the idea in modern astronomy that the universe started in a super-dense
high-energy state. Both agree that the
universe began as a non-solid substance that held within it all the potential
of what that universe was to become, but which was itself quite different than
what the universe later became. But
while astronomy claims that this early dense ball of energy abruptly appeared
out of nothing for no discernible reason, the Bible offers the Creator as a
much more plausible explanation for its existence.
On the second day of the Creation, God separated the primeval
waters that would become the earth from the waters that would become the rest
of the universe (Gen. 1:6-7). He did
this by pushing them apart (or “dividing”
them) with an expanse called the firmament (raqiah
in Hebrew). This name, which
indicates something ‘spread out,’ refers to the amazing ability of this
firmament, or what today we call (outer) space, to separate “the waters that were below the firmament and
the waters that were above the firmament” (Gen. 1:7). Since Genesis is written from an
earth-centered (geocentric) point of view, its concern is primarily to describe
how the earth came to be. But we can
imagine that this rapidly expanding firmament (outer space) not only separated
the waters of the proto-earth from all the rest, but also separated the waters into
many other pockets, too, that would soon become all the stars and planets, a
vast and sudden expansion in the size of the universe.*
* Modern science also talks about an incredibly vast and rapid
“inflation” of the universe at a very early time in its history.
On the third day, God began to work on the orb of primeval water
that would become the earth. This is
when he said, “Let the waters under the heavens be collected to one place and
let the dry land appear…. And God called the dry land ‘earth’ and the
collection of water he called ‘seas’” (Gen. 1:9,10). This is when he separated out all the things
we call minerals and rocks and dirt from the primeval waters, making a
separation between the solid parts of the earth and the seas and other liquids
and gases.
Then, on the fourth day, God turned his attention to the
rest of the universe, and turned all the rest of the primeval waters into the
sun, the moon, and all the stars and planets (Gen. 1:14-18).*
* It’s interesting that modern astronomy has identified water
as being relatively abundant in space.
This includes a massive concentration recently discovered in the large gas
cloud of the Orion nebula (see picture above).
Many people are confused by the creation of the “lights” of
the sun and moon and stars on the fourth day because light itself was already
created on the first day (Gen. 1:3-4). But
even modern astronomy talks about a ‘first light’ of the universe that was
emitted not from any stars, but from the universe itself in an early stage of its
existence. This was the first step in
bringing order into a chaotic universe.*
* This early light corresponds to the ‘first light’ of the
universe preserved in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). This light was not produced by stars, but is
radiation left over from the earliest universe itself.
In Hebrew, the heavenly bodies are not actually called “lights” (as
often translated) but “luminaries,” in other words, things that contain or
shine forth light. This word is
appropriate both to the sun and stars that create light as well as to the moon
and planets that merely reflect light.
Once we take account of this succession of steps in the
Creation account, it becomes clear that the waters over which the Spirit
hovered were quite different than modern seas.
They were instead the non-solid stuff of the universe out of which all
that we see was made: the earth, the
sun, the moon, the stars, etc. God took
chaos, and out of the chaos created order and life.*
* Although there are several interesting points of
correspondence between the Biblical account and the explanations of modern
science, there are also many differences between the two. The most striking difference is in the time
scale of these events. Science claims a
period of 100 million years before the creation of the earliest stars, while
the Bible teaches only four days. One of
the reasons given for the great length of time before the appearance of the
earth (about 9 billion years) is that the explosion of the Big Bang would necessarily
have resulted mostly in hydrogen and some helium, without any heavier
atoms. To account for heavier elements, there
must have been a long period of time in which the earliest stars, made of these
lighter elements, would be able to produce the heavier elements found in the
universe today. The Biblical account has
no need of such long stretches of time, since God was able to create the full
range of elements right from the start.
(For more on this topic, see the index category Creation.)Home | Seminars | Teachings | Media | About Us | Support | Search
Copyright © 2014, 2020 by To The Ends Of The Earth Ministries
One of the ways of looking at the universe in the first few nano-, or pica- or even lesser seconds of the 'Big Bang' of creation, was that the whole mass (of the universe) at less than the diameter of a few light years, would have appeared 'liquid' or 'water like' to the eye of the prophet who was recording these 'visions' and with his limited knowledge and vocabulary, he might have written it as 'waters'. Rather too simplistic?
ReplyDeleteNo, that's the idea exactly. Lacking a more technical vocabulary, "waters" expresses the idea of a non-solid mass, the stuff from which the universe as we see it was then created.
DeleteSo if "there was just this dark, confused mass of “waters" or the ‘primeval chaos’: a time when everything was a confused mess, before the Creator sorted it out in the Creation."How did it get there? Wouldn't that mean that God created the dark, confused mass of “waters" or the ‘primeval chaos.' And if so, wouldn't that mean that should be the first creation of God to be stated in Genises 1:1 ?
ReplyDeleteThe prior creation of the "waters" is not addressed in Gen. 1, as many scholars have noted. But this is assumed elsewhere in the Bible, as in Heb. 11:3. The reason this is not mentioned in Gen. 1 has to do with the intention of the writer: he was describing how what we see was made, in common with other ancient Near Eastern accounts. Gen. 1:1 is a section heading, summarizing what follows, as is found frequently in Genesis (Gen. 3:1, 5:1, etc.)
DeleteI need a clear understanding of this verse 2 how long did the spirit of God hovering upon the water did hovering of the water in days weeks months or years your answer we be reall appreciated
ReplyDeleteI am not an educated man, but when I read "And the spirit of the lord was hovering over the face of the waters (the waters over our planet)" I create a graphical illustration in my head where Hashem, the God of old, the one who created everything, sees his own image reflected on the water surface, the same way we see ourselves reflected on the mirror (as when we wash our faces, or brush our teeth...) and silently meditate with those love related inner statements such as: Wow, I look so much like Dad, or Junior!.. Or: What does my wife see in me? after all: I am older now, definitely not the handsome man I was when we got married, etc...
ReplyDeleteOne of the earliest Jewish commentaries on this subject related interpretations, dating from New Testament times, interpreted it this way: “A spirit of love before the Lord was blowing (hovering) over the face of the waters.” This holy wind is not a part of the chaos, it is Hashem's godly/fatherly/motherly/kingly love conveying the promise of life, order, and beauty coming forward into existence just before he spoke creation... I comes to mind the way a bird is hovering over the nest it has built for it's eggs (the new life he will love and nurture)... Again, I am not an educated man, I only think as such.
Orlando J. Chils